Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 8,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 am
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
United States] we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
Milkey, who argued on behalf of the petitioners in Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
United States [transcript, PDF]. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
The docket sheet in the United States Supreme Court tells the tale. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:16 pm
Testimony of the experts on German law revealed that the concept of domicile in Germany is comparable to the concept of domicile in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:14 am
United States, No. 13-564, was denied. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 3:49 am
The beneficiary is from China and he obtained his Master’s degree in Plant Pathology in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Second, if the petitioner can satisfy Section 2254(d), he must prove as a factual matter -- and under a de novo standard of review -- that he is entitled to habeas corpus relief under Section 2254(a), i.e., that he "is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
United States, reversing and remanding Mr. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:51 am
Petitioner cites no statute or case law allowing such a practice. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Under [federal immigration regulations], Nabil (and Sawsan, derivatively) would be deportable … if Nabil and Sawsan were actually married when Nabil entered the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:50 am
The couple intend to get married within 90 days of the fiance’s arrival in the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Injunctive relief generally is not available to prohibit the making of defamatory statements as prior restraints on speech violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
But at least in the United States, our rights are not so much stolen from us as they are simply lost by us. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:56 pm
CASE: I-601 Hardship Waiver of Inadmissibility APPLICANT / BENEFICIARY: Indian LOCATION: Mumbai, India (Applicant) / North Carolina (I-130 Petitioner / Applicant’s US Citizen wife) Our client first came to the United States on a valid F-1 visa in May 2007 to attend college in the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:42 pm
CASE: Marriage to US Citizen Green Card CLIENT: Indian LOCATION: Cleveland, OH Our client came to the United States from India. [read post]
