Search for: "United States v. Man" Results 5021 - 5040 of 6,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2011, 3:57 pm
Hence, as a means of preventing the escape of slaves, the change in the law was made.The case is United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:03 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
For instance, in the new Seventh Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm by Michael O'Hear
For instance, in the new Seventh Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:10 pm by Record on Appeal
Recently, several United States Supreme Court aficionados have posted on the increasing use of dictionary references by SCOTUS justices. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:28 pm by Steven Eversole
The article states that Homewood's narcotics unit, tactical team and special operations unit carried out a search warrant on the hotel room. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:07 am by SHG
United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
The article states that Homewood's narcotics unit, tactical team and special operations unit carried out a search warrant on the hotel room. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:02 am
The report cites the case of Uganda Association of Women Lawyers and others v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
  Terrorism off the agenda, for now   In the courts: Secretary of State for the Home Department v BF [2011] EWHC 1878 (Admin) (18 July 2011) Control order of man accused of undertaking terrorist activities during trip to Pakistan was lawful. [read post]