Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 10,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The officers drove past Washington Park, where a crowd of people were drinking and shooting off fireworks. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the recent cert grant in Benisek v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:30 am
United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
It appears that Cuba remains a special case, one where the economic interests of the United States may play a secondary role--or better put in today's terms, one in which the "better deal" produces a marketplace in the the United States is willing to barter economics for politic objectives. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that “[u]nder the new policy, immigrants would be suspect if they are in the United States legally and use public benefits — such as Medicaid, food stamps or housing assistance — too often or are deemed likely to someday rely on them. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:22 pm
One thing I do find interesting is that WilmerHale's Seth Waxman, the Solicitor General of the United States during President Clinton's second term and The American Lawyer's 2016 Intellectual Property Litigation Lawyer of the Year, is on the brief. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:52 am
Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
Kondoudis, PC Patent Attorney Washington www.mekiplaw.com Share This [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:06 pm
City of Kent, Washington v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
Pierce Jr. of the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:52 am
He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:50 am
He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument on a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:54 pm
United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), which outlined the limits of free speech, particularly in war time. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:49 am
Circuit Court of Appeals reminded us in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
Here is a summary of the plaintiff's allegations, from Judge Liam O'Grady's opinion denying a motion to dismiss: Plaintiff is a retired Senior Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force ("SMSgt. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:38 am
See Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
