Search for: "Wall v State" Results 5021 - 5040 of 7,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:12 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Some of Prowel’s co-workers made negative comments, both orally and in writing, calling him "Princess," "Rosebud," and faggot, and putting graffiti on the wall stating that he had AIDS. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:00 am
v Davenport Lyons – the saga continues (IPKat) IPO guidance on patentability of computer programs following Symbian comes under criticism (Managing Intellectual Property) (Out-Law)   United States US - General The twelve days of EFF (EFF) Wall Street Journal reports Obama, Lessig and Google have shifted their positions on net neutrality; Google, Lessig slam WSJ report (Lessig) (IPTAblog) (Lessig) (Techdirt) (Excess Copyright) (Ars Technica) (Public… [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:59 am
  Second Circuit Appeals finally rules on Viacom v YouTube Last week, after five years coursing through the veins of the US judicial system, the Viacom v YouTube case is finally subject to an appellate court ruling courtesy of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals clarifying the scope of the safe harbor provisions in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) (see previous IPKat/AmeriKat reports here). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:26 am
  Plaintiffs’ home states have a regulatory interest in providing redress to its citizens for acts of wrongdoing.Actiq, 2015 WL 1312015 at *13.By this time, however, the handwriting was on the wall. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Larrimore, 5 So.3d 513, 518-19 (Ala. 2008); Walls v. [read post]