Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 33,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2018, 2:50 pm
Specifically, SB 1300 would (1) prohibit reliance on Brooks v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:35 am
(ruling that the claimed method was patent-ineligible under the “law of nature” doctrine); and the 2001 case of Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am
California (Indian Gaming Compact, Breach of)Davilla v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
(People v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
DUI law is actually more complex than most people realize, and the recent case of Coffey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:56 pm
Recognition of the federalist ideal, embodied in specific language in the statute, should lead the Court to uphold California’s law, not to strike it down, according to the dissent.The April 27 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
On September 18, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law, Assembly Bill 5 (“AB5”), codifying the landmark case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:39 pm
Here: 11-399 bsac The Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 12-399 bsac 63 California Indian Tribes 12-399 bsac American Civil Liberties Union 12-399 bsac Arizona et al 12-399 bsac CurrentandFormerMembersofCongress 12-399 bsac Family Law Professors 12-399 bsac Friends Committee on National Legislation et al. 12-399 bsac Hamline Univ Sch of Law Child Advocacy Clinic 12-399 bsac Lower Sioux Indian Community 12-399 bsac Nat’l Lat Psych Assoc 12-399 bsac Navajo Nation 12-399 bsac… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
Court dismisses some of trucking association’s challenges to California AB 5, but injunction remains
14 Feb 2020, 8:07 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court, in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:00 am
Under California law, the answer depends on the type of work performed by the caretaker. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 7:09 am
Florida courts have interpreted this to apply only to “media” defendants, similar to the early Internet Law case, It’s in the Cards v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:29 pm
Supreme Court denied cert last week in Diaz v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 7:10 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
Code §§ 1750 et seq.; (3) violations of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm
Perhaps it would apply California law. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
The case had a good overview of prevailing wage law in California, and what it takes to plead such a case. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:38 pm
Authored by:Robert Friedl, Senior CounselCAPSTONE LAW APCThe post Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Yet the new California law provides: It is not a violation of this section to engage in lawful picketing arising out of a labor dispute, as provided in Section 527.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. [read post]
