Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 5041 - 5060 of 26,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm by The Law Office of James K. Meehan
While the employer’s medical experts discussed the claimants underlying osteoarthritis, they failed to sufficiently address whether the claimants work activities exacerbated his symptoms or caused his pain to become symptomatic. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 9:00 pm by <ADMINNICENAME>
  Here’s a link to the Arkansas Attorney General’s website for lemon law claims. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:35 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The extensive detail provided in the regulatory and criminal filings will substantially bolster the claimants’ allegations in the pending civil cases and could even encourage other claimants to come forward. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:20 am by Michael B. Stack
    Just remember as you go through your day—your claimant is someone’s brother, dad, son, daughter, cousin, sister, uncle, aunt, neighbor, etc. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:44 am
Social Security will typically schedule a CE if a claimant's medical records are thin, he hasn't seen a doctor in a while, or it is indicated somewhere in his application or records that he has a condition for which he hasn't received treatment. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 1:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
According to Frankel, some of the claimants in the consolidated action have already filed a notice of appeal. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by Peter Margulies
Judge Tigar was correct that more than thirty years of past practice support citing a claimants manner of entry as one factor governing asylum grants, but not wielding it as a categorical bar. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
One of the great curses on our legal system is the merger objection litigation phenomenon, pursuant to which nearly every proposed public company merger inevitably attracts at least one shareholder lawsuit in which the claimant alleges that the proxy statement disclosures regarding the proposed merger were inadequate. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 8:24 am by Tom Cummings
Where the eye is injured but not destroyed, the issue is whether the eye was lost for all practical intents and purposes, i.e. where the injured eye does not contribute materially to the claimants vision in conjunction with the uninjured eye. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
One may assume that, in keeping with the practice of vessel owners and their underwriters in other shipwreck cases, Carnival is trying to settle quickly with claimants, before they retain lawyers to investigate the facts and make claim for the full amounts due under the maritime law. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:04 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The compensation rate for PTD is 66-2/3% of the claimants average weekly wage (AWW) (440.14) payable bi-weekly until age 75. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:04 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The compensation rate for PTD is 66-2/3% of the claimants average weekly wage (AWW) (440.14) payable bi-weekly until age 75. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:44 am by Dean Freeman
F.S. 768.72 allows personal injury claimants in Florida to seek punitive damages against defendants for especially egregious wrongs. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:19 pm by Hui Zhang
However, it held that Safe-Run’s administrative complaint was towards VMI’s distributor, not towards VMI. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
  During the estate's proceeding against the Fund, the court held that although negligence and causation is established once an underlying settlement is reached with a qualified healthcare provider, the Fund may introduce evidence of the claimant's preexisting risk of harm, survival odds, and their ability to work if the evidence is relevant to establish the amount of the claimant's damages. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:39 am by Daniel Gwertzman
Alijaj’s use of excessive margin in implementing his inappropriate investment strategy, Claimants faced margin calls in January 2009 and were forced to liquidate their portfolio. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
The Court held that the law was an unconstitutional infringement of the Federal Government’s exclusive authority over foreign affairs, which includes the resolution of war-related disputes. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Ray Dowd
The Court held that the law was an unconstitutional infringement of the Federal Government’s exclusive authority over foreign affairs, which includes the resolution of war-related disputes. [read post]