Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 12,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 7:29 am
Meanwhile, an NLRB law judge had ruled an ambulance company committed unfair labor practices by failing to pay bonuses to long-term employees. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:58 pm
Article 20, paragraph 2 provides on direct or indirect ownership as follows: When the customer is company: a) it is an indicia of direct ownership, the ownership of an interest exceeding 25% of the capital of the customer, owned by a natural person; b) it is an indicia of indirect ownership, the ownership of an interest exceeding 25% of the capital of the customer, owned through controlled entities, fiduciaries or intermediaries. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm
The court reviewed the requirements of commonality under Rule 23(a) in conjunction with the predominance requirement under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
Article 20, paragraph 2 provides on direct or indirect ownership as follows: When the customer is company: a) it is an indicia of direct ownership, the ownership of an interest exceeding 25% of the capital of the customer, owned by a natural person; b) it is an indicia of indirect ownership, the ownership of an interest exceeding 25% of the capital of the customer, owned through controlled entities, fiduciaries or intermediaries. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
Article 20, paragraph 2 provides on direct or indirect ownership as follows: When the customer is company: a) it is an indicia of direct ownership, the ownership of an interest exceeding 25% of the capital of the customer, owned by a natural person; b) it is an indicia of indirect ownership, the ownership of an interest exceeding 25% of the capital of the customer, owned through controlled entities, fiduciaries or intermediaries. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
The company had an account there for about six months, in Zurich. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:58 am
an easel display with integral order forms;c. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
B. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:32 am
., No. 16 C 3676, Slip Op. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:22 am
Franklin C. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
Pepper’s operations recounts, companies find a consumer’s “bliss point” where the product will “pique the taste buds enough to be alluring but [doesn’t] have a distinct, overriding single flavor that tells the brain to stop eating. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
Hadi of working with a third-party IT company to identify exculpatory material and then deleting the rest, which Lebowitz says is “narrowly tailored,” to allow the case to keep moving. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:33 am
b. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
Arguing that the actual and potential claims and relief sought in the three administrative complaints and the Lufkin compliance review have been disallowed in PPC’s bankruptcy case or discharged by PPC’s bankruptcy plan and confirmation order, the company filed a motion asking the court to: (a) enforce to order granting the objection; (b) enforce the plan and confirmation order; and (c) declare that the claims and relief sought in the three administrative cases… [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:15 am
If a beneficiary goes missing or cannot be found, then there are a few options including using professional heir search companies. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm
A confusing matter, which, the court noted, could have been avoided if the legislature chose to use serial commas (“A, B, or C” rather than “A, B or C”) as a drafting technique (contrary to Maine practice, which seems to cut against serial commas): We would be remiss not to note the clarifying virtues of serial commas that other jurisdictions recognize. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 10:52 am
Accordingly, Menon argues that, while Articles 10(b) and 10(c) concern service of process, Article 10(a) relates to mailing legal documents for other purposes, such as discovery. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
With respect to the other three appraisers, Southwest failed to prove part C because, while they had indicia of independent businesses—home offices and business cards, and one tried to get work from other companies—they did not in fact perform work for other companies. [read post]
