Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 13,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2009, 12:20 am
In Roark v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
” The new legislation sets forth requirements for SIMABs, which are modeled on the existing federal Board, but allow some greater flexibility with respect to the number of members and terms of office. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:10 pm
The Court referred to Reynolds v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 4:03 am
" Judge Weiner then set out a number of decision in which courts have upheld the termination of a public employee found guilty of “excessive absence” including McKinnon v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The European Patent Office is holding its second Online Services User Day of 2015 in Zürich on 22 and 23 October. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am
Defendant appealed the court's decision.The Appellate Division rejected Defendant's appeal challenging the Supreme Court's ruling. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am
Defendant appealed the court's decision.The Appellate Division rejected Defendant's appeal challenging the Supreme Court's ruling. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
WHREN v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:49 am
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual -This e-book reviews the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual -This e-book reviews the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brenner v Governor's Off. of Empl. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brenner v Governor's Off. of Empl. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2009) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
James V. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
[There is] a very legitimate concern about prosecutorial abuse, about future presidents being targeted for things that they have done in office.... [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
The Appellate Division subsequently affirmed the lower court's ruling.The Appellate Division said that "When interpreting a legislative enactment, a court's primary consideration ‘is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature,'" citing Riley v County of Broome, 95 NY2d 455.Here, said the court, the plain meaning of the language of the original rule, as well as its… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco (1967) and Marshall v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:48 pm
In Elbert v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 8:13 am
After the hearing, the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) found there was probable cause for the arrest and upheld the suspension. [read post]
