Search for: "Direct General Insurance Company" Results 5041 - 5060 of 5,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
The general perception is that the Court decides its big cases by five-to-four majorities on ideological lines. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
Background Janus Capital Group (JCG) is the holding company for a family of mutual funds. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this paragraph upon proof of a violation of N.J.S.2C:17-1 which resulted in bodily injury to any emergency services personnel; or (9) Knowingly, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, points or displays a firearm, as defined in subsection f. of N.J.S.2C:39-1, at or in the direction of a law enforcement officer; or (10) Knowingly points,… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm
Co. (4th Dept., decided 6/11/2010) Plaintiffs submitted a certificate of insurance (COI) providing that they "and their respective officers, employees and agents [we]re named as additional insureds on [Thomas Johnson Inc.'s general liability policy with Sirius on] a direct, primary and non-contributory basis. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:41 pm by Brian Cuban
  By the time the movie is over you want to go hire a lawyer to sue an insurance company, any insurance company. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:15 am by Law is Cool
Sound fiscal finances are essential to sustain recovery, provide flexibility to respond to new shocks, ensure the capacity to meet the challenges of aging populations, and avoid leaving future generations with a legacy of deficits and debt. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Is the witness testifying to direct knowledge? [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am by James Hamilton
Excessive risk taking by AIG and certain monoline insurance companies that provided protection against declines in the value of such asset backed securities, as well as poor counterparty credit risk management by many banks, saddled the financial system with an enormous unrecognized level of risk. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 1: Reuse, Recycle, Rethink: The Impact of Google Book Search Panelists: Peter Jaszi (Moderator), American U. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:09 pm by Adam Levitin
 (One way to avoid being steered due to dealer reserve is to go in with a direct financing offer lined-up from an independent finance company; I wonder how many consumers do this, though.) [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The law, developed by Congress over many years, generally leads to antidumping and countervailing duty orders. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The law, developed by Congress over many years, generally leads to antidumping and countervailing duty orders. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 11:37 am by Heather Young
Parties to the settlement reached among the WTC Captive Insurance Company (the "WTC Captive"), the City of New York, the contractors the City hired, their subcontractors, and attorneys for over 10,000 plaintiffs alleging injuries from the WTC site operations addressed Judge Alvin K. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm by Christopher Simon
Typically, these cases can be resolved with the insurance company for the restaurant fairly easily, but in this case my neighbor is not litigious and naively thought the restaurant would just voluntarily pay for the damage the rock caused. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Plano Independent School District Docket: 09-1131 Issue: Whether the constitutionality of a public school district’s student speech policy banning the distribution of any written material should be evaluated under the “substantial disruption” standard, which the Supreme Court has generally applied to restrictions on student speech; or whether, because the student speech policy is facially content- and viewpoint-neutral, it should be evaluated… [read post]