Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 5,625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
The question is, how much does that claim signify to consumers? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Comments on Technical Correction VI. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
Nearly 75% of US largest companies use derivatives and nearly 94% of Fortune 500 CEOs are satisfied with their firm’s use of these instruments[vi]. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Count VI – No violation of constitutional rights. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
A sports spectator assumes similar risks as does a sports participant. [35] Courts usually conclude that a “spectator has a duty to protect himself or herself not only against the dangers of which he or she has actual knowledge but also against such dangers incident to the game as would be apparent to a reasonable person in the exercise of due care. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:43 pm
It thus inevitably removes more than is necessary to restore novelty vis-Ã -vis D1 and hence, does not amount to an allowable disclaimer. [2.4] The Board cannot accept the argument of the Respondent that the disclaimer should be allowed in view of the fact that according to the disclosure of D1 the copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene are only preferred fluoropolymers because this issue has no bearing on the relevance of the respective… [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 11:06 am
However, the Spanish Law on Arbitration does not allow the arbitrators to examine of their own motion whether unfair arbitration clauses are void and secondly, the Spanish Code of Civil Procedure (Ley 1/2000 de Enjuiciamiento Civil) does not contain any provision dealing with the assessment to be carried by the court or tribunal having jurisdiction as to whether arbitration clauses are unfair when adjudicating on an action for enforcement of an arbitration award that has… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
See earlier ataxingmatter series on the AMT in which this is explained in detail: The Senate and the House on the AMT (July 12, 2005); What Should Congress Do About the AMT (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, Part VI). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:22 am
Farmer's reasoning, however, does not withstand scrutiny. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
To my surprise two posts refer to CEO's and outside counsel selection (See my post of Oct. 23, 2005: CEO's involved in selection of law firms; Nov. 11, 2005: involvement in choice of outside counsel; As with all metaposts, the leftovers fall into every which topic (See my post of July 31, 2005: proximity of GC's office to CEO's; Jan. 4, 2006: to shake up department, Feb. 10, 2007: CEO is a notable constraint GCs operate under; May 28, 2007: how often does CEO talk to… [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:57 pm
The change in the share-holders of the company does not change the legal identity of the company. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:24 pm
That simply does not seem possible. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:30 am
VI ("In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the assistance of counsel for his defense). [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
+ Are institutional investors, including pension funds, required or permitted to consider such impacts in their investment decisionsAccording to the executive summary of the report, in relation to the role of directors, "Directors are in a fiduciary relationship vis-Ã -vis their companies. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
Not unusually (see Part II), Twitter does things a little differently. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:41 pm
One student explains: Stanford Law School changed to the quarter system, leaving their students in very precarious position vis a vis the bar exam. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 6:01 pm
The stunning lack of enforcement, particularly with respect to Article VI, is embarrassing. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 1:15 pm
Nimby or Banana (build absolutely nothing, near anything) are already rearing their head vis a vis alternative energy. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
See for example the Guidelines A-VI 1.2 where it is stated that the applicant "may make [the withdrawal] subject to the provisio that the content of the application is not made known to the public. [read post]
