Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 5:36 am
This is what happens in the United States where state defamation law has been eclipsed by federal free-speech law (the First Amendment). [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 pm
(Answers translated to English by Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor) Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of Patents… [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:31 pm
Having agreed that any dispute arising from the contract should be settled at the English court, the appellant was bound by the terms of the contract. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
AJ (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1191 (27 July 2011… Court of Appeal dismisses 3 joined asylum appeals: welfare of children was sufficiently taken into account. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:55 am
McCullen v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm
Case: State of Goa v. [read blog]
8 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm
Case: State of Goa v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
In December 2016, the company’s appeal against that decision was rejected by the Fifth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO (the contested decision), which considered that the pronunciation of the first two words ‘Fack ju’ would be perceived by the relevant public almost indistinguishable from that of the English expression ‘Fuck you’. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 11:30 pm
The culprit here is surely the Supreme Court, which, in Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
Alternatively, Y requested the dismissal or the stay of the proceeding on the ground that a divorce case was pending before the English courts. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
If the algorithm was not exposed to many non-native English speakers when it was first developed, it could be biased to approving native speakers. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:46 am
Brown v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
[It] discusses TechSearch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade U.S. [read post]
