Search for: "German v. German"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 5,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm
Martinez, Alex Verdugo, Xander Bogaerts, Hunter Renfroe, Christian Vázquez, Kike Hernandez, Bobby Dalbec, Christian Arroyo). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm
I discussed it at length when the Supremes decided Caperton v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
In holding that the mere linking to defamatory material did not constitute defamation, the Supreme Court of Canada in Crookes v Newton noted the threat to freedom of expression in spreading liability too broadly. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 10:26 am
[iv] And while some government contractors are already growing their AI capabilities to capture AI-specific contracts,[v] we expect to see more intense focus on the utilization of AI more generally, such that the incoming raft of regulations will be front of mind throughout the industry. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
Kennedy, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, this year I also assigned two other readings: a 1998 article co-written by Amy V. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Prof. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
References- E. coli bacteria were discovered in the human colon in 1885 by German bacteriologist Theodor Escherich. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
Now that Donald Trump has secured the Republican nomination, won federal court rulings making it extremely unlikely he will be disqualified from seeking office, and apparently established that even a felony conviction will not torpedo his campaign, the time has truly come for a careful analysis of his campaign’s immigration policy proposals. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said that on July 1, 2005, after spending several hours in a bar in Manhattan, at which he consumed at least six beers, the defendant attended a friend's party in Merrick in Nassau County. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
The defense had identified another two studies that were germane.[15] Chief Judge Rosenstengel’s opinion is noteworthy for its fine attention to detail, detail that matters to the validity of the expert witness’s enterprise. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
German solution: collective licensing schemes w/a nonwaivable remuneration right for UGC creators, not just to industry players. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am
The Department of Homeland Security barely has any “official” top officials. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
Scope and Impact of Safe Harbors Official description: Scope of entities and activities covered by safe harbors; incentives (and disincentives) for creators, copyright owners, online providers, investors, and users; impact on licensing activities; effectiveness of remedies, including ability to proceed in federal court in case of disputed notice or misrepresentation; economic impact on creators, copyright owners, service providers and copyrighted works; relevant empirical data; and other… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
The EPC has no explicit provision preventing double patenting by the same applicant of the same invention; not by two applications filed on the same date but not connected via priority or otherwise, not by two applications filed on different dates but linked by priority (so having the same effective date but different filing date), not by by two applications filed on different dates but with the same filing date (i.e., a parent and a divisional). [read post]
