Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 5041 - 5060 of 182,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 11:45 am by Matthew Reisig
There are defenses when you’re charged with possession of paraphernalia, and there are strategies to mitigate your legal exposure even if a court fight isn’t in your best interest. [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:34 am by Goldberg Jones
UPDATED: You realize you haven’t received this month’s child support payment from your former spouse. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
It will be interesting to see how the fight to balance the books for the States and the United States works out. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 2:39 pm
Here's a particularly relevant snippet: The first disadvantage of an elite education . . . is that it makes you incapable of talking to people who aren't like you. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:46 pm
If you haven’t heard of this project it’s definitely worth checking out. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 10:40 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Some people think they just aren’t interesting enough to worry as they don’t have dirt worth digging up. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 9:34 pm
The post on californiastemcellreport titled CIRM Bonds: 3.55 Percent vs. 5.168 Percent Interest includes the text: If it [CIRM] can't use the cheaper financing, the state [California] faces close to another $1 billion in interest costs, according to some estimates. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
The treatment of the admissibility of the appeal is also quite interesting.The application under consideration was filed on July 21, 2011.On May 7, 2012, the applicant’s representative had a telephone interview with the Examiner. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 2:04 pm
There's an interesting article in the November 8, 2006 National Law Journal, The Law School Curriculum: What is technology's role? [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 8:54 am by Jon Brodkin
The FCC dismissed AT&T's request for interest and "consequential damages," saying the company can pursue those in court. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:45 pm
IN . . . one or more of the following cases," then the country can restrict application of existing laws in situations where "the acts are detrimental to a Party's economic interest" etc.But I don't think that's what the provision is trying to say.Certainly this is one area that could use some clarification before it's up for ratification. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Jaime King
Now, don’t get scared off by the fancy equations and economic terms like “concavity”—there is more than enough substance in plain English to make this paper accessible to an interested non-economist. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm by John Mattox
An agency can’t award an offeror a contract if its proposal doesn’t conform with a material solicitation requirement. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 2:28 pm
But here’s the thing; this isn’t 9/11. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:53 am by Gerard Magliocca
In case you haven’t heard, there’s an election upcoming in a few months. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 1:29 pm
You shouldn't be in front of your computer right now. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 4:31 pm
We told you the race for Justice Lorie Gildea's seat would be particularly interesting to watch this election season, and so far it hasn't been disappointing.Jill Clark (on left), one of three candidates challenging Gildea (on right) for the seat, has filed an action with the Minnesota Supreme Court seeking to disqualify Gildea and have the justice's name removed from the ballot. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The conflict arises from Aous Fakhra’s renunciation of his interest in the estate and a subsequent disagreement regarding the effectiveness of the renunciation. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 5:27 pm by elliot
While it may be encouraging to see Congress turning its focus to net neutrality, it’s troubling that lawmakers appear to be more interested in the thoughts of a handful of large corporations than those of the public that’s been overwhelmingly calling for the preservation of existing net neutrality protections. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:37 am by Diane Polscer
  To the court, “[t]he exclusion applies to any claim arising out of the purchase of property by an entity in which any insured has a financial interest. [read post]