Search for: "In re F. E." Results 5041 - 5060 of 7,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2011, 2:33 am by war
It looks like, if you’re an Optus (mobile) subscriber you get 45 minutes storage “free”, but you can “buy” more if you want. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:35 am by Michael H. Cohen
     take reasonable measures to ensure that the patient has not previously, in the course of treatment by one or more other practitioners, or otherwise, obtained and used anorectics in excess of the quantitative and durational limitations on the use of anorectics prescribed by §6907.E; and 8. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Separately, Puerto 80 has appealed the court’s earlier denial of its petition for pretrial release of the domain names under 18 USC § 983(f). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
By Thad Cox and James McEwen Ever since June 8, 2005, Representative Lamar Smith, then Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, along with several co-sponsors, have attempted to change the U.S. patent system. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 am by sevach
El Tribunal Supremo examina el recurso de casación y como el recurso se centraba exclusivamente en invocar el motivo impugnatorio consistente en la falta de motivación de la sentencia por falta de acierto, invocando el apartado c) ( infracción de garantías procesales) del art.88 de la Ley Reguladora de la Jurisdicción Contencioso-Administrativa, en vez de apoyarse expresamente en el apartado f) ( infracción de las normas del Ordenamiento… [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) KF250 .F352 2010Legal WritingLegal writing / Richard K. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 11:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Hayden added that: [i]f you do not think we are at war, there are some very troubling definitions that you might want to attach to that act [of killing bin Laden]. . . . [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:48 pm by Rumpole
Are you ready for some F O O T B A L L ? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:51 am by Matthew Nelson
Remember, Rule 37(f) (now 37(e)) was intended to provide some level of protection against the imposition of sanctions, just as the categories are intended to. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:05 pm by Sylvain Métille
Auparavant, cette matière était traitée par la loi fédérale du 20 juin 2003 sur l’investigation secrète (LFIS). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:25 am by Stephen Jenei
A Beauregard claim is a patent claim named after In re Beauregard, 53 F.3d 1583 (Fed. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:25 am by Brendon Tavelli
” Oh yeah, and section 2(e) of SB 24 also specifically provides that a HIPAA-covered entity will be deemed to have complied with the state’s notice requirements if it has complied completely with Section 13402(f) of the federal HITECH Act. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:09 pm
Dessa forma, os ministros Marco Aurélio, Dias Toffoli e Luiz Fux proveram o agravo regimental, para que o Supremo possa julgar o RE, vencidos os ministros Ricardo Lewandowski e Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Laurent
Le blog est consulté en France (70% des visites), en Allemagne (9%), en Suisse (5%), en Belgique (4%), au Royaume-Uni (3%), aux Pays-Bas (2%), aux Etats-Unis (1%) et même (pour la première fois cette année) au Népal ! [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm by Stephen Jenei
The entire opinion is as follows: “In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]