Search for: "John Marshall" Results 5041 - 5060 of 5,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and to Chief Judge Spottswood Robinson of the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 1:45 pm by Joe Patrice
The apocryphal author of “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it,” has come back stronger than a 90s trend. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:29 am by Victoria Kwan
” Chief Justice John Roberts addresses the 2018 Judicial Conference of the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:34 am by fjhinojosa
Jeremy Telman, John Marshall’s Constitution: Methodological Pluralism and Second-Order Ipse Dixit in Constitutional Adjudication, 24 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:49 am
Alter (Northwestern); "The Perverse Effects of Ideology on International Criminal Justice" byShahram Dana (John Marshall); and "Are Arbitrators Political? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
., the Justices take the bench, and Chief Justice John G. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm by Mark Walsh
Already seated near the justices’ spouses are the court’s chief officers: Marshal Pam Talkin, Clerk Scott Harris, and Jeffrey Minear, the counselor to the chief justice. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:58 pm by David Lat
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to the Conference’s Executive Committee. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
Supreme Court, a fraction of the time of major justices such as John Marshall (34 years), Stephen Field (34 years), Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (29 years), Hugo Black (34 years), William Brennan (34 years), and Antonin Scalia (30 years). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The pattern began in 1795 when the Senate rejected George Washington’s pick for chief justice, John Rutledge. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:28 am by Rory Little
But based on the writings of a the late Justice John Marshall Harlan II, the Court has decided over time that new “substantive” constitutional rules should apply retroactively to everyone, even “final” cases, while new rules that can be described as merely “procedural” should not. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:39 am by William G. Ross
Waite and Melville Fuller and Justice John Marshall Harlan I were prominently mentioned as presidential candidates, but they strongly discouraged such talk. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:27 am by Seán Binder
John Hudson reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Alfred Brophy
 They were young army officers who helped put down the John Brown Rebellion in 1859. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The concept of “separate but equal”—a phrase that appears in (the first) Justice John Marshall Harlan’s Plessy dissent but not in the majority opinion—was thus entrenched in American law for over half a century. [read post]