Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5041 - 5060
of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2008, 4:35 am
Demon In'tl LC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Sachs, in which the court will determine when an entity is an “agent” of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Ocasio v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:24 am
Kohler Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
In Doe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:29 am
See Matal v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
I also enjoyed reading Margaret Chon's recent book chapter, Certification and Collective Marks in the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
:"Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising, on the basis of a keyword identical that trade mark which that advertiser has, without the consent of that proprietor, selected in connection with an internet referencing service, goods or… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
Wisconsin State Legislature, 592 U. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
On this day in history, the Supreme Court ruled that the states are required to provide legal counsel to criminal defendants who are unable to pay for their own defense. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
Mark this day in your calendars. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
Mark has some ideas about that.* Of Mice and Men: Regeneron v KymabAs David's post on Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 87 (Pat) clearly shows, mice have a very special relation with patent case law. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
Stock, supra (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
The Czech Patent and Trade Mark Office and the Prague Municipal Court were equally unimpressed. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
In Grade v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
Mark Walsh provides a “view” from the courtroom for this blog. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:05 am
Contrary to Respondents’ suggestion, the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
