Search for: "People v. More"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 43,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2009, 2:37 am
But now, after the Hayes decision, many more people are barred from possessing a firearm or even ammunition! [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 7:23 am
Oil States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
That was the situation in Howsden v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:25 am
The Supreme Court changed that after appellant was sentenced, ruling that people sentenced after the Act's enactment are entitled to the more lenient penalties. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:51 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:55 pm
By Eric Goldman Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied 11 NY3d… [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
" People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm
In Devillier v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:04 am
(Hell, this post is Part V in a series with that title.) [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 7:05 pm
In 2022, Robert Crimo III murdered seven people and injured dozens more with an S&W rifle in Highland Park, Illinois. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:58 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Baltimore and Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 11:47 am
In Davis v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 8:50 am
Perhaps more people should look at themselves in the mirror and have that conversation with themselves. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
Reasonable people could disagree. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 12:18 pm
And two people who would otherwise receive $15,000 get millions of dollars instead.But, at some level, this still sounds something more akin to winning a lottery than any straightforward attempt at systemic justice, no? [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:06 pm
” In a prior case (BMG v. [read post]
