Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 5041 - 5060 of 6,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 8:24 am by T Fifty
Nor did I earn my job solely through merit. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
The Human Rights Act has prevented some people being deported to other countries, the most notorious recent example being two suspected terrorists who could not be sent back to Pakistan as there was a real risk they would be tortured. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm by NL
The Defendants argued that Redstone v Welch and Jackson [2009] EG 98 (our report here) should be followed in interpreting Abbey National v Cann [1991] AC 56 and Whale v Via Systems [2002] EWCA Civ 480. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm by NL
The Defendants argued that Redstone v Welch and Jackson [2009] EG 98 (our report here) should be followed in interpreting Abbey National v Cann [1991] AC 56 and Whale v Via Systems [2002] EWCA Civ 480. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
The Human Rights Act has prevented some people being deported to other countries, the most notorious recent example being two suspected terrorists who could not be sent back to Pakistan as there was a real risk they would be tortured. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:42 am by Victoria Pynchon
 And yet I've talked to your clients - hundreds of them by now - and most of them - whether middle managers, sole proprietors, or even CEO's - have come to define themselves as justice seekers in opposition to the devil on the other side of the "v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am by Andres
The case is that of Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
Nash was the sole director, held certain amounts in trust for the claimants Starglade Properties Ltd. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:51 pm by Darren O'Donovan
(Professor Clive Symmons has written about the importance of considering this estoppel point when analysing the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Boland v An Taoiseach case). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fed Circuit affirmed rejection solely on nonenablement grounds because the disclosure revealed that the invention could not work as claimed. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
It was about being forced to join a political party which most consider to be odious, solely due to fear of persecution. [read post]