Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2009, 7:03 am
Services Ltd., 172 F.3d 132, 144 (2d Cir.1999) (affirming dismissal of corporation chairman’s claims for contribution and indemnification against his co-owner and corporation’s manager and vice president). [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am
Stated differently, the consumer has only suffered an economic loss. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:45 am
The Fourth District first reflected on the shifting meanings of the term “limitations” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Tulsa Professional Collection Services Inc v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog) [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 12:26 pm
From April. #4 United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
See Kerzner Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:58 am
Ford Motor Co., 832 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:13 am
Judge Saris’s district court opinion denying the motion to exclude one of the plaintiff’s economic experts in Natchitoches Parish Hospital v. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
Corcoran Co. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:12 pm
The December 4 opinion in Kinetic Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
For example, in Yellow Cab Co. of Sacramento v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
For example, in Yellow Cab Co. of Sacramento v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:09 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:13 pm
[The order rests] on two interpretations of state law: (1) This sort of photography company constitutes a “public accommodation,†defined by state law “any establishment that provides or offers its services, facilities, accommodations or goods to the public, but does not include a bona fide private club or other place or establishment that is by its nature and use distinctly private. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
In Great Oaks Water Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 6:59 am
Many such state convictions were voided by federal courts. [read post]
