Search for: "S. Holmes"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 5,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 9:15 am
Who's the Boss? [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
On ‘street homeless’, this is not to be found in the 1996 Act (though it is in s.71 Housing (Wales) Act 2014 – largely by importing the court’s account of the Pereira test!). [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
Party anonymity does not obstruct the public's view of the issues joined or the court's performance in resolving them. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Acá ven algo más sobre esto. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
This article will give a geek's-eye view of the current state of computerized voting[8], discussing its history, why it is so problematic, and finally giving a suggestion as to what is the best direction to go towards in the future. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 1:03 pm
A defense lawyer’s worst nightmare. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:02 pm
” No adverse reactions had been reported as of the posting of the recall notice on the Food and Drug Administration’s website. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Crawford’s patent was messy. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Chicago, 130 S. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Found that the user’s ability to alter the video game character’s appearances is insufficient to constitute transformative fair use of Hart’s publicity rights. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm
In the event the proceeds of the foreclosure sale by the senior lender did not fully repay the NCE’s loan, the NCE would still have a right to obtain a monetary judgement against the EB-5 Project Owner that could be satisfied with other assets of the EB-5 Project Owner, but often times an EB-5 Project Owner’s sole asset is the EB-5 Project itself, and once that is sold, the EB-5 Project Owner will often have no other assets available to repay the… [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Opening batsman for UK Law Blawging, Nick Holmes of Binary Law, has catalogued them in detail with the precision of a test match scorer. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
It's what we hope all our clients do anyway. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
”[7] The Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Fourth Estate v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
I base this inference on my knowledge of the proceedings of President Biden's Supreme Court Reform Commission, since Biden's July 29th op-ed and speech provided no specifics. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Even fewer thought this would be on the ground that the mandate could be and thus must be justified as an exercise of Congress’s taxing power. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Buckle up, it's going to be a bumpy ride. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Buckle up, it's going to be a bumpy ride. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
The complaint does not allege that they block sidewalks, the synagogue's driveway, or any vehicular or pedestrian traffic. [read post]
