Search for: "Shields v. State"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 5,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
In fact, the unanimous court made it clear it disagreed with the analysis, stating “there are some significant jurisprudential problems with those aspects of their judgments that warrant comment. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
He gave up on his appeals in State of Washington v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In a strongly worded order issued last week, a district judge overturned a 2008 state ruling that granted the authority permission to tap groundwater from three valleys in central Lincoln County. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 4:09 pm
As the famous (or perhaps infamous) “Declaration of Cyber Independence” in 1996 by John Perry Barlow stated, “Where there are real conflicts, where there are wrongs, we will identify them and address them by our means. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
… On dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Under Miranda v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am
We may learn more about these pitfalls from the other trademark owner-v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Minnesota is one of only a handful of states with third degree murder on the books. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
The LCD states the following: “Evaluation of the clinical literature indicates that studies comparing the efficacy of CTPs to alternative wound care approaches with patients’ autologous skin are limited in number, apply mainly to generally healthy patients, and examine only a small portion of the CTP products available in the United States. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm
Tejas Narechania's new paper, Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle, forthcoming in Michigan Law Review argues that a major identifying factor for the Supreme Court's interest in patent cases is a field split: an area where a particular patent law doctrine plays out differently in patent law than in other fields of law where it is used. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
Canada’s major trading partners including the United States and the European Union recognize that net neutrality rules do not prevent courts or government agencies from ordering the removal of illegal content from the Internet. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:52 pm
In Teva Pharms., USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Sorrel v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
By threatening the legal shield that allows UGC services to exist, the bill ensures that Internet companies won’t have any real choice at all. [read post]
