Search for: "State v. Brown"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 8,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
The change, to s.37 of FOIA, was inserted into the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 in the dying days of Gordon Brown’s premiership. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am
Norfolk Southern Railway (Nov. 8): Whether the Constitution’s due process clause bars a state from requiring a corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction as a condition of doing business in the state. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:08 pm
DL v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:10 pm
DauscherToday, the California Court of Appeal held in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & [*2]Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303 [2001]). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong dismissed the federal claims and remanded the others to state court. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
At the Huffington Post, Jelena Hasbrouck suggests that if Perry v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 1st District.The Law Lady. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am
From Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 12:04 pm
Brown, 5095, 5757/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 312; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am
Tax law professor Dorothy Brown commented: “Here’s another example of NYT tax reporting ignoring race. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was more sympathetic to Mallory. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm
” By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in Pugin v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
In light of the obvious provenance of section 4 in Flood (the explanatory notes of the Act state expressly (para 29) that “The intention in this provision is to reflect the existing common law as most recently set out in Flood v Times Newspapers”), it seems very likely that the section would be interpreted as importing in an obligation of responsibility on the part of the defendant, even though it does not state this expressly. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
After the Supreme Court announced the rule of de novo review in Brown v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:30 pm
This reasoning flows from a well defined line of cases: Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 4:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Here, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Texas Supreme Court’s ruling in Montgomery County Hosp Dist v Brown makes clear that while an oral agreement can modify an employee’s at-will employment status, to do so, the employer must unequivocally indicate its “definite intent to be bound not to terminate the employee except under clearly specified circumstances. [read post]
