Search for: "State v. David." Results 5041 - 5060 of 14,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a Tenth Amendment case, drew notice from David Kopel at the Volokh Conspiracy, CBS News, the Christian Science Monitor, and Crime & Consequences. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post was written by Lawrence Demase, Douglas Everette, Robert Frank, Arnold Grant, Todd Maiden, Jennifer Smokelin, Robert Vilter and David Wagner. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm by Thomas Hopson
District Court for South Dakota and Judge David Hansen on the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
A revision for EPO Guidelines on interlocutory revision is coming up, David says, so get ready to it. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Adam Schwartz
Our brief was written by Professor David Post, and by Jonathan Sherman, Perry M. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:46 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
David Cheifetz over at slaw.ca valiantly attempted to sort out this mess before the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision today. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Mack Sperling
United States Forest Service, 87 F.3d 339, 343 (9th Cir. 1996) ; Cray Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
David Wolfe QC, the Chair of Press Recognition Panel spoke to the Protecting the Media Conference about the recognition and section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:23 pm
"Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]