Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:32 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 11:58 am
I first saw the news about Thursday’s decision affirming fair use in the Authors Guild v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:34 pm
” Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:55 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
The EUIPO published The Baseline of Trade Secrets Litigation in the EU Member States in 2018. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is what Jaime tells us:Trademark trolls and trade mark hijacking in CubaThe start of negotiations and eventual opening of commercial relations between Cuba and United States is tempting some individuals to jump at the chance to register US trade marks in order to force trade mark holders to negotiate their entrance into the Cuban market. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm
Graham v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:18 pm
The current case of Kaiser v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 5:09 pm
Supreme Court’s March 24, 2015 opinion in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am
Coates v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm
a=v&q=cache:VG1APbknSRMJ:pdfserver.amlaw.com/tx/ramirez_petition.pdf+Lorena+Briseno,+as+next+of+friend+of+Domonique+Ramirez+v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 11:03 am
World Family Corporation v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 1:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Here are two additional lines Jim and Linda propose to govern a liberal state in its promotion of virtues and moral goods: (1) Persuasion rather than compulsion: “We reject the idea that rights insulate right-holders from moral judgments about their exercise and argue that the state may encourage people to exercise their rights responsibly, short of compelling them to do what the government thinks is the responsible thing. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Virag, SRL v. [read post]
