Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 13,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2007, 2:16 am
In Voda, M.D. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:39 am
Bullock v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm
Think of examples like zoning boards, licensing boards, land-use regulators, and many, many others. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:40 am
United States; Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:25 am
In the United States, the doctrine was enshrined in the famous property rights case of Johnson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
” In Blue Harvest, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:12 am
In Knick v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:39 am
Mazzetti (Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies; Non-Indian Fee Simple Lands)Ruchert v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:31 pm
The first is whether the United States has sovereign immunity from the suit by virtue of the Quiet Title Act(QTA), 86 Stat. 1176. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 11:20 am
Yet Acts of Congress can be "the supreme Law of the Land," U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
HT Search Engine Land. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:44 pm
Jeffrey Antonio (Indian Pueblo Lands Act; Tribal Jurisdiction)Rosita George v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
” We address in this opinion the question whether the plaintiffs (several States, the city of New York, and threeprivate land trusts) can maintain federal common law public nuisance claims against carbon-dioxide emitters(four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am
It was in the highest appellate court in the land, the United States Supreme Court, that the final word was handed down. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
an area bigger than the state of Ohio, locked up by oil companies. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:08 am
Alabama and Alabama Legislative Black Conference v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm
Walking a fine land between the Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm
” Petitioners then claimed that the project would have an undue adverse impact on the nearby state-owned, DEC–operated boat launch at Tupper Lake. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:54 am
The Court stated that General Obligations Law § 9-103 applies when (1) the plaintiff is engaged in one of the activities identified in General Obligations Law § 9-103 and (2) the plaintiff is recreating on land suitable for that activity. [read post]
