Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 5041 - 5060
of 29,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Seventeen out of the eighteen files were classified at the `secret’ level. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
’ He further stated, `So its your choice. [read post]
18 May 2013, 7:36 am
State of Connecticut Dept. of Educ. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
See Vandever v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Similarly, Arizona v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Petrosino v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 5:45 pm
" People v Cook, 2017 N.Y. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 1:02 pm
Not only is that the result, but the opinion concludes with a section entitled "A Plea For Calm," the text of which states: "At the trial level and here on appeal, the parties’ “scorched earth” postures exude acrimony: There have already been two appeals from anti-SLAPP rulings. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
LLP (real party in interest or Dentons), a major law firm with offices throughout the United States. . . . [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
States. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
On 27 July 2022, in RT France v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Judgment was handed down in respect of this subsequent hearing on 23 July 2014 in Coventry and others (Respondents) v Lawrence and another (Appellants) (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:47 pm
This was illustrated in a July 10, 2017 decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
In Jack Daniels v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:29 pm
Yesterday I introduced the issue of substantial compliance with the formal requirements of making a valid will, and the case of Robitaille v. [read post]