Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 13,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
Meyers of the Ontario Superior Court stated that:[8] …. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:04 am
Steele v. [read post]
Despite Setbacks, Department of Justice Charges Full Speed Ahead in Litigating Labor Antitrust Cases
2 May 2022, 8:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
May of the Free State Foundation. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:39 pm
In Davidoff v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 4:39 pm
In Davidoff v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
The post relates to the decision in the case of Yu v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
See Minister of Health & Ors v Treatment Action Campaign & Others (No. 2). [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm
Justice Alito announces opinion in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
A publicly available price index illuminated the underpayments, as did General Land Office records demonstrating that Shell paid higher royalties to the State even though it owed the Rosses the same royalty. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:03 pm
The case, United States of America ex rel Streck v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:37 pm
(It didn't.)I don't believe I have seen the issue discussed in an opinion before.Well, on December 3rd, the Arizona Supreme Court issued State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
One of those cases, Smith v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:45 am
This is not always helpful for the buyer as the seller cannot recover the VAT paid on its inputs so may charge the buyer a higher price. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
In CFPB v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 10:45 pm
One day after the United States International Trade Commission ("USITC" or just "ITC") instituted three investigations further to Ericsson v. [read post]