Search for: "State v. Word" Results 5041 - 5060 of 40,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
A couple of weeks earlier, however, the Supreme Court of the United States, known as SCOTUS, threw a wrench into Regan’s plans by agreeing to hear the case known as Sackett v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Adams relating to the flag on his property that says, 'Fuck Biden and fuck you for voting for him.'" The Agreed Entry further states: Consistent with the United States Supreme Court decision in Cohen v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
This case, however, requires us to decide two legal questions: (1) the meaning of "resident within this State," as those words are used in Article V, section 2, of the Oregon Constitution; and (2) whether the secretary was required to conclude that relator met that legal standard. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:45 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Notice that the words "students" and "children" are used interchangeably. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:11 am by Mark Wortman
The court, however, cited another provision of Missouri law, which states that whenever a statute uses “words importing…the masculine gender,” this includes “females as well as males. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
In other words, the law was not about fetal health, safety, or termination — and certainly not about protecting women’s health — but ultimately sought “to chip away at the private choice shielded by Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
" A majority found the words actionable, and in delivering their opinion stated in dictum "Or, that he gives bad counsel, it is actionable. [read post]