Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 8,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 11:27 am
United States may depend upon how the Court understands two words: “apportion” and “contribution. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:22 pm
This week's case in point: the United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
The United States’ presentation then shifts gears. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
Commissioner (1989) and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 3:13 pm
One reason may be that Riley has more representative facts but Wurie lets the United States play a larger role: As petitioner, DOJ can file a full length merits brief, a reply brief, and get 30 minutes of oral argument, instead of filing an amicus brief and getting the expected 10 minutes of the state’s oral argument time. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:33 am
It granted without limitation the government appeal in the other case: United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:17 am
Upon returning to the United States, KAL registered the foreign adoption in Family Court in Kings County, New York. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
” Or so says the petitioner in Lane v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:43 pm
CASE: Marriage-Based Green Card CLIENT: Chinese LOCATION: Cleveland, OH Our client came to the United States from China and he is currently pursuing his Master’s degree in Cleveland Ohio on an F-1 student visa. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Amicus Curiae Brief of United States at 5 n.2. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:50 am
United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; claim of warrantless search of vehicle by police; "The petitioner claims that the habeas court erred in concluding that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:07 am
Later that same day, respondent emailed petitioner informing him that she was on her way to the United States, and that she planned on returning with the children around August 9, 2013. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:03 am
s habitual residence, Hollis consented to her moving to the United States with H.L.O. indefinitely. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:51 pm
The Commissioner, acting on information provided by appellant, referred the matter to its fraud investigation unit and ultimately to the District Attorney's Office, which declined to prosecute. [read post]
