Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 9,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
I just watched the live webcast of today's hearing of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights of the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate on "Standard Essential Patent [SEP] Disputes and Antitrust Law". [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:47 am
In the case of the United States, in addition to the computer servers, giant analysis buildings, weak or wrong legal justifications, and the secret price tag, one of the lasting and more harmful effects has been on the public. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court specifically held in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
United Mortg. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:05 am
Feldman thus became the first by a federal court to reject a constitutional challenge since the Justices’ decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:31 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
United States, Justice William Douglas came to the same conclusion. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
United States, an Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
234/06 P Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM -- and here it is again. [read post]
29 May 2007, 7:18 pm
”The case cite is Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:09 am
Although it is true that Houraney, who is not admitted to practice law, could not represent NE Holdings on his own, see Lattanzio v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:55 pm
The firm represents clients throughout North Carolina and the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 10:49 pm
"] Last week I wrote about the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:19 am
United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
This article will examine how United States courts have dealt with this problem. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 4:43 am
United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2005) (per curiam), urged us to more carefully distinguish between true jurisdictional bars and claim-processing rules that may be waived and to revisit our use of the ‘jurisdiction’ label in that light. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am
…It is of course undisputed that plaintiff sold space to Google, but that alone is insufficient to establish that plaintiff used the Klumba mark in United States commerce. [read post]
