Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 5041 - 5060 of 9,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am by Jonathan R. Siegel
United States, the Supreme Court determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” within the meaning of a statutory prohibition against impeding a federal investigation by destroying or concealing “any record, document, or tangible object. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina and Kathy Clements, The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial: From Trial Judges to Sentencing Judge, 86 GEO. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
Original Article 09/17/2010 By Marian V. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:46 am by aallwash
While we haven’t learned much about the FISC’s legal interpretation of these two key provisions, here’s a brief guide to what we do know:  Section 702 Title VII, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), “Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons” (50 USC § 1881a) Allows for targeting of communications of foreign persons located… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am by gmlevine
require registrants for usTLDs to have a substantial nexus with the United States. [read post]