Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 7,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 11:18 am
United States, 518 U.S. 81, 113 (1996). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Fisher then petitioned to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, and the petition remains on the Court’s current docket. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:30 pm
The Sixth Circuit weighed in on a circuit split, finding that a ban of pornographic materials as part of a defendant's conditions of release was vague and overbroad in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Kemp, supra, at 328-329; Crumbley v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:29 am
United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83, S.Ct. 407 (1963). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:25 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
That idea was turned on its head in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
United States Soccer Federation denies extending antitrust immunity to USSF in regulating professional soccer, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 325 (2011)Caitlin M. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:40 am
Bank of the United States, to Holmes in American Well Works v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:01 am
Tassi, a student activist from Cameroon, entered the United States in 2002 and applied for asylum. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Ramos in Stulman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
For people not born in the United States, a simple conviction can put in jeopardy their status in the country. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:39 am
Please address application packets to: Matthew Maddox Program Coordinator United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia Albert V. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
