Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 24,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 3:00 am
If the service occurs in the United States, then only US law is relevant. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
Soon after, the USADA announced that three members of Armstrong’s team have all received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:35 pm
, “the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use and manufacture. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In this way, any interference was of his own making (this argument had been deployed and accepted in McFeeley v United Kingdom (1980) 3 EHRR 161). [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
" The petitioner argued before an Immigration Judge that he should be allowed to remain in the United States because of the persecution and torture of gay men taking place in Jamaica. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
The question comes up: should owners of copyrighted works that are created outside the United States register those works in the United States? [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:15 am
Action Ctr. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:21 pm
Harrison v United States, 392 US 219, 224-225 (1968). [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:20 am
Lilly v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm
Moreover, it argues, U.S. courts have jurisdiction under the FSIA’s “commercial activity” exception, which (among other things) allows lawsuits based on conduct that takes place outside the United States “in connection with a commercial activity of a foreign state” and causes a direct effect in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:17 am
The Sixth Circuit today issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 11:18 pm
State, 371 Ark. 599, 606, 269 S.W.3d 326, 331 (2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2006, 2:45 pm
Travelers Casualty, in which he overturned the United States District Court who found it expedient to overlook the bad acts of Travelers. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
Just 5 years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld a taking of property for purely economic reasons. [read post]
