Search for: "United States v. Was"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 102,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 am
It states: (1) This section applies where a person has made an asylum claim and – (a) his claim has been rejected by the Secretary of State, but (b) he has been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a period exceeding one year (or for periods exceeding one year in aggregate). (2) The person may appeal to the Tribunal against the rejection of his asylum claim. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:57 am
United States, 458 F.3d 1345, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
3 Mar 2005, 7:53 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 4:04 pm
Louis, Missouri (No. 08-626), we submitted this supplemental brief to address points raised in the invitation brief filed by the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
They each had dual citizenship in the United States and Canada. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:09 am
Lesmes and M.A.Y. to the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:18 am
Impact on Capital Punishment in the United States At the time of the decision, Texas had 29 minors awaiting the death penalty who were instead given life sentences. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
United States; NYT; WSJ; SCOTUSblog; Ribstein; Bainbridge; Fisher @ Forbes; Sandefur; Kirkendall; Hurt] [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:26 am
March v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm
The Defendant’s Basis for Certiorari Johnson & Johnson argued that the Massachusetts state courts’ opinions had been contrary to a prior decision of the United States Supreme Court (Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 11:27 pm
Michael Alan Stollery, and United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:30 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
United States, 529 U.S. 172, 191 (1997)]; United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm
May (The Free State Foundation) & Andrew Magloughlin (The Free State Foundation) have posted NFIB v. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
