Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 5061 - 5080 of 9,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 6:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Both efforts have proved unavailing (Zoeller v Sweeney, November 6, 2014, Dickson, B). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
” Moreover, the court held that the employers’ failure to have a separate offset policy was not tantamount to an affirmative and unequivocal intent to be legally bound by the provisions in their handbook or meal period policy. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 4:02 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Although we are not bound by the Fifth Circuit's interpretation of Texas law, see Penrod Drilling Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:27 am
In 1989, China allowed a deposition in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am by David Markus
Courts are known for being tradition-bound, but today the SJC is one of only five state high courts that still issue opinions in Courier. [read post]