Search for: "Centers v. State"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 22,000
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am
In Facebook, there is no real urgency for service because the claim centered on the defendants’ conducts in 2014 and 2015. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
” Citing Clinton and United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm
And prior to this year, the court’s last signed decision in July was United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
See also NLRB v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 2:34 pm
The second case, Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:19 pm
., S.A. et al v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:13 pm
Today’s Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
Vijay Tharwani v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
Vijay Tharwani v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:01 am
In 3M v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:47 am
The underlying case, Nathan Van Buren v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:28 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 am
” Slip op. at 12-13 (emphasis in original) (distinguishing State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:10 pm
Citing the court’s 2006 decision in Purcell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:10 am
"For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/van-buren-eff-security-researchers-amicus-briefFor bios of security researchers who signed the brief:https://www.eff.org/cases/van-buren-v-united-states/security-researcher-amiciFor more about CFAA reform:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/01/these-are-critical-fixes-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act Contact: AndrewCrockerSenior Staff Attorneyandrew@eff.org NaomiGilensFrank Stanton Fellownaomi@eff.org [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:54 am
In 2014, in Burwell v. [read post]
