Search for: "Court of Appeals, 5th District"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 5,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
This limitation led a district court in Alabama to issue a limited injunction against a statute there that required doctors to give information about normal fetal development to women who were seeking abortions because of serious fetal anomaly. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Indeed, this bias from inadequate control of confounding infects several pending pharmaceutical multi-district litigations. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Pabst Sales Co., 124 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1941). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
So why in the name of common sense shouldn’t an injunction from a district court issue as a matter of right to a victorious patent owner? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
Framing the issue the Fourth Circuit explained: “The sole question presented by this appeal is whether an employee’s complaint lodged within her company—as opposed to a complaint filed with a court or government agency—may trigger the protection of the FLSA’s antiretaliation provision. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
CPF22517661) related to the permit of the 469 Stevenson Street project currently on appeal before the 1st Appellate District, 2nd Division (Case No. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
This may also help explain the appeal of materiality. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
The Vatican may be the world’s most famous enclave, but the most numerous are the 162 districts spread out along the Indo-Bangladesh border. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 6:57 pm
Oliver, 977 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), a Fifth District Court of Appeals case where it was the State Attorney filing a Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
United States (5th Cir. 2013) illustrates this: When Sikh IRS agent Kawaljeet Tagore sought a religious exemption from IRS’s no-weapons-in-the-workplace policy for her kirpan (a 3-inch dulled symbolic dagger), the court concluded that accommodating the request was an “undue hardship,” but allowed the RFRA claim to go forward, so that the trial court could determine whether denying the exemption “furthers a compelling government interest with the… [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
[Refer: David Gallai, `Polygraph evidence in federal courts: Should it be admissible? [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office Statements About the Tax Scheme The district attorney’s office has made the following statements in relation to tax violations. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
France Paris Appeal Court: Che Guevara’s portrait: an icon, not a trade mark (Class 46) Germany German banks move towards deal on patent collateralisation (IAM) Munich Regional Court dismisses actor/comedian Michael ‘Bully’ Herbig’s trade mark and personality rights infringement case against Take Two Interactive over ‘Bully – Die Ehrenrunde’ computer game (Class 46) Polar bear Knut… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
American Tobacco Co., 84 F.3d 734 (5th Cir. 1996), which flatly held that a "district court cannot manufacture predominance through the nimble use of [bifurcation]," because "a cause of action, as a whole, must satisfy the predominance requirement of (b)(3). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The settlement, filed in federal court today, will reduce harmful air pollution by more than 24,500 tons per year and requires Hoosier to spend $5 million on environmental projects. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am
But the content of those grooming policies has never been established, and the fact that there are grooming standards for both girls and boys teams was not even mentioned in the stipulated facts submitted to the district court for purposes of resolving the case. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
This week I interviewed Clark Neily about his new book, Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution's Promise of Limited Government. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
This logic has some superficial appeal. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Rowan University 5th Cir. [read post]
