Search for: "D. S." Results 5061 - 5080 of 236,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2018, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
These included Hospira's Rule 50(a) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on the Issues of Safe Harbor, Noninfringement, Invalidity, and Damages and related briefing, Hospira's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) and, in the Alternative, For Remittitur or New Trial Under Rule 59 and related... [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:42 am by Joe Consumer
Ah, summer’s over (although you’d never know it by the temperatures in NYC) and we must thank perennial wrongdoer Halliburton for easing our way back into the blogosphere. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:00 pm
The CCA held that the defendant's own admissions that he'd taken Xanax and Valium and the officer's statement that it probably wasn't good to drink "on top of that" were irrelevant to the issue of alcohol intoxication without evidence to extrapolate the effect of the drugs on the alcohol consumption.If you'd like to read a more detailed summary, click here.Ex parte Kevin Rowe. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 1:27 am by Emmanuel Barthe
Ce référentiel, explique le décret, fixe les règles auxquelles les systèmes d'information mis en place par les autorités administratives doivent se conformer (...) [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 3:00 pm by familoo
I'd write you a blog post, but I'd rather be curled up in bed trying to finish The Secret Barrister's excellent book... [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
IS ENFORCING A LAW THAT'S NEVER ENFORCED some sort of due process violation? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:07 am by Veronica Silva
buen día el día de hoy lunes tengo que hacer un deposito de convenio, sólo quiero que me ayuden a validar la carta convenio. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 2:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Hertz’s insurers denied coverage for the company’s investigative costs. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:57 pm by Silviana Cocan
Tout au long de l’AÉP, les réunions des groupes de travail ont été fermées au public et les débats de la journée de clôture se sont déroulés à huit-clos. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:20 am by John L. Welch
[Had Applicant Yoest not counterclaimed, Opposer would have had nothing in the record].The Board first looked to Applicant's Section 2(d) counterclaim. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
But it happened in this opposition, in which the Board sustained Opposer's 2(d) claim, finding Applicant's mark TEXAS BIG BITES for "organic pastries" likely to cause confusion with opposer's marks BIG TEXAS for danish, pastries and sweet bakery products and BIG TEXAS BUTTERKRUNCH for sweet bakery products. [read post]