Search for: "DANIELS v STATE"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 5,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
9 Jun 2009, 12:45 pm
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:05 am
Holwell in Manhattan federal court for their roles in a multimillion-dollar, sub-prime mortgage fraud scheme, as charged in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 5:16 pm
” Williams v State Farm Mut. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 5:16 pm
” Williams v State Farm Mut. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:59 am
By Ashley PaynterIn Bonner v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 2:29 am
Daniel Sokol Helen Davies (Brick Court Chambers) & Richard Blakeley (Brick Court Chambers) describe Merger Action Group v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:30 am
Panama already exports most of its goods to the United States duty-free under our trade preference programs. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:59 am
The case of Daniel Ray Wilkes v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:50 pm
The ruling in H.M. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:16 am
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP V. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 am
Daniel Sokol Barry Rodger (University of Strathclyde Law School) has been doing some very interesting empirical work on private rights of action in the UK. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:04 am
Daniel P. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
The potential roadblocks -- her involvement in the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:27 am
San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:00 pm
See, e.g., Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:59 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:10 am
Crucible Materials Corp v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:54 am
Supreme Court Justice Byron White, in Taylor v. [read post]