Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 5061 - 5080 of 25,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2012, 4:55 am by admin
OF LABOR 11-192 UNITED STATES v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 5:49 pm by Richard M. Re
In its filings in the Supreme Court, the United States raised a new argument that it had not advanced in the court of appeals. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:32 am
On the following day, March 27th, the Court will conduct hearings on the second case, United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:48 am
Saxon Mortgage, Inc., and answered a certified question from the United States Bankruptcy Court. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:51 am by Rick
” Better Courts Now complains that Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:47 am
The result here is consistent with the Sixth Circuit's rulings in cases like United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:46 pm
To mark that anniversary, in 1950 the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 423 (V) (4 December 1950), inviting all States and interested organizations to observe 10 December of each year as Human Rights Day.As has been the recent practice, for this year the United Nations adopted a specific theme: "Stand Up For Someone's Rights! [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am by Victoria VanBuren
  Soon after, the USADA announced that three members of Armstrong’s team have all received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:24 am
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment issued an interim policy under which the state will review potential CO2 emissions as part of the permitting process for all new baseload electric generation units proposed to be built in Kansas. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:39 pm
I haven't blogged recently about the Ninth Circuit's blockbuster computer search and seizure decision in United States v. [read post]