Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 12,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2020, 2:48 am
I'll start by going through the opinions, and then I'll offer some thoughts of my own. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
Moreover, that because the defendant was allocating social housing to homeless applicants in an undisclosed manner, outside the terms of the 2015 scheme, it was unlawful per R (Lumba) v SSHD (2011) UKSC 12″. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:19 am
As articulated in 1983 by the Supreme Court in Dirks v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:31 am
She watched McGuire take a yoga class and `star[ed] through the window at [her]’” She also followed McGuire on a BART train.McGuire v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:22 pm
Fletcher International, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
The court of appeals noted that: On a number of occasions, "[w]e have explicitly held that the requirement of Rule 32[(i)(4)(A)(ii)] is not satisfied when the court does not address the defendant personally concerning the defendant's desire to allocute but instead addresses defendant's counsel only. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
(Zervos v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am
I feel for the CJEU's translators, who couldn't just take those liberties. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
When a sample was especially important, I made damn sure the test was done by one of the good ones.So where does this leave us as a practical matter? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
§314.70(b)(2)(i)). [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
The victims may get little financial compensation: restitution appears not to be a common remedy in criminal libel cases — and even if restitution were made available, and were easier to get through the criminal process than through the civil process, you can't get blood from a stone even through a criminal prosecution. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The text has taken several forms, but currently members of Congress swear as follows: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on… [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:00 am
Nicosia v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm
On the contrary, it is highly unlikely that a defence under s.50 of the SCA would fail given the Defendants’ reasonably held belief that the TROs are invalid and that their breach does not give rise to a criminal offence. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
The FDA does not allow regulated companies to send Dear Doctor letters willy-nilly. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
So, what does this mean and how does this apply to divorces in New York? [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:46 am
Burton v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
The good news is that I largely moved away from using Scribd a few months ago, but I do have some backlogged legacy links I'm posting through these quick links.] [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
The defendant does not argue he is "a law unto himself" or the executive orders violate "his own standards. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:56 pm
ShareIn Shinn v. [read post]
