Search for: "Doe v. State" Results 5061 - 5080 of 93,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
 EUIPO claimed, that the earlier mark was ‘rather “lost” in the overall impression produced by the various elements of the pattern’.Fulia markThe Court disagreed with the contested decision, the EUIPO and the interveners, stating that the mark stands out on the canvas. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Does it require egregious conduct, or chronic conduct or chronic and extreme conduct or a pattern of delinquency? [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:00 am by Clare Montgomery QC, Matrix
However the broad approach of the UNHCR to the question of confidentiality does not appear to have been raised by Mr McGeough in the courts. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:08 am
"However, the Court of Claims does not have jurisdiction over challenges to the constitutionality of statutes, even if such determination is necessary to resolve a claim for money damages against the State. [read post]