Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 5061 - 5080 of 37,548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
§ 946a (2018), report for FY18 states (at 9) that “[o]f the 502 cases in which findings were entered in FY18, 246 of them, or 51 percent, included sexual misconduct related offenses (Articles 120, 120b, and 120c). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am by Abbe R. Gluck
” In this regard, it is interesting to note that the leading precedent the government relies on is United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:38 am by Peter J. Sluka
  And while they can be stated with disarming simplicity, rarely is their application quite as simple. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Following the United States Supreme Court’s twisted rulings in Baze v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The company has told the human rights groups who are calling on Telenor stop the sale or delete the data that doing so would endanger employees who work [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm by Bruce Zagaris
It also disputed Russia’s claims of genocide organized by Ukraine in the Luhansk and Donetsk separatist regions, which the Russian president, Vladimir V. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm by Bruce Zagaris
It also disputed Russia’s claims of genocide organized by Ukraine in the Luhansk and Donetsk separatist regions, which the Russian president, Vladimir V. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
  More specifically, the focus is on the risk of complicity in the human rights violations of others (principally states but also other actors (insurgents, agents,  That, in turn, can be understood to involve three distinct areas of human rights risks: (1) conflict zone risks; (2) states that may be directly or indirectly involved in the commission of human rights wrongs or in support of states committing these wrongs; and (3) states, other… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The state would nullify such autonomy for this group of physically disabled patients.This civil rights class action seeks to rectify the exclusion of physically disabled individuals from the EOLOA, calling for reasonable modification of the assistance prohibition, to ensure that physically disabled Californians are afforded equal benefit of the EOLOA.Today plaintiffs filed their opposition to the State’s Motion to Dismiss. [read post]