Search for: "HARDING v. HAND" Results 5061 - 5080 of 6,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2017, 9:43 am by Randy Barnett
In the wake of Marshall’s capacious 1819 opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am by Máiréad Enright
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
VC Laster’s Transcript Ruling in Gerlanc v Beatrice A recent transcript ruling by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery in Gerlanc v Beatrice, CA No. 2017-0211-JTL (Mar. 23, 2017), reaches the opposite result on similar facts due to key differences in Delaware’s LLC Act. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
VC Laster’s Transcript Ruling in Gerlanc v Beatrice A recent transcript ruling by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery in Gerlanc v Beatrice, CA No. 2017-0211-JTL (Mar. 23, 2017), reaches the opposite result on similar facts due to key differences in Delaware’s LLC Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
On the other hand, the careful, persistent, and creative use of a handful of tools will increase the likelihood of success and will help defense counsel practice at the highest level in one of twenty-first century American law’s most trying crucibles. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
For Bremmer, "state capitalism" denotes a level of government control of the market that is less dirigiste than a "command economy," but more heavy-handed than the social market institutions of Europe. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s really hard to understand what’s happening to your data. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  I support that to some extent but you can cut back and still have chilling costs from likely confusion test—b/c it’s fact dependent it’s hard to get summary judgment/early decision. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Concern is balance: responsibly disseminate tools while guarding against their falling into the hands of those w/bad intent. [read post]