Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 5061 - 5080 of 36,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Legal rights are therefore ephemeral, as we know from the likely imminent demise of Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:56 am by Ananya Mukherjee
Similarly in Prosecutor v Milan Martic, the ICTY held that any ensuing harm to civilian objects, such as the environment, cannot be justified in the “absence of closeness” between such objects and the legitimate military target. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
” As one example, “Social media platforms would be unable to take even minimal steps to help protect American children or teenagers from content promoting suicide and self-harm. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial begins on 23 May 2022 and also relates to whether serious harm was caused by McCormack’s allegation that Wright fraudulently claims to be Satoshi. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:51 pm by INFORRM
This is likely to play a prominent role in scrutinising the legal requirement for “serious harm” in the Vardy v Rooney spat. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am by Elizabeth Whatcott
The use of targeted attacks against civilians, against hospitals, against maternity wards, train stations filled with people fleeing, deliberate use of sexual violence against the Ukrainian population as a way of creating, ah, of creating horrific scenes, the way that they’re attacking Ukrainian identity and culture – these are all things that are war crimes, that Putin is responsible for, these are all things that are crimes against humanity, and that’s why Canada was one of the… [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Maybe Google will now strike the same kind of agreement with Match Group, though it's unclear how soon the trial in the Match Group case will take place (theoretically the court could try to rush things the way Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers did in Epic Games v. [read post]