Search for: "Harding v. State" Results 5061 - 5080 of 15,884
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am by Nathan Cortez
(Justice Breyer’s colloquy with Paul Clement, counsel for the state plaintiffs, invoking McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs and their treaters are often from the same state, which means there's no diversity of citizenship and no opportunity for the out-of-state drug company to remove the case to federal court.Any case that helps drug companies avoid that result is worth a minute's thought.Joseph v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Facts The facts of these cases can be very briefly stated. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Facts The facts of these cases can be very briefly stated. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:49 am by Will Baude
After my post defending aspects of the Court's opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
  Illustrating the divide among both federal and state courts, on January 16, 2014, the U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
King then requested permission to remove the hard drive, but the troopers denied his request and seized the computer, including the hard drive. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
Robinson is a capital habeas case in which the Sixth Circuit en banc held, 11-5, that the state court reasonably applied the Brady v. [read post]