Search for: "Holmes" Results 5061 - 5080 of 6,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
2015 - It's been another busy copyright year! [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:27 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Prepared Remarks of Richard CordrayDirector, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Field Hearing on Arbitration Denver, Colo.October 7, 2015 Thank you all for joining us in Denver today. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
    Told to adopt “a foreshortened, thematic approach to the material,” but unable to forgo the traditional mission of the Holmes Devise volumes as an authoritative “history of record,” Post has done both. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[2] (Oliver Wendell Holmes notably dissented: “It will need more than the Nineteenth Amendment to convince me that there are no differences between men and women, or that legislation cannot take those differences into account. [read post]
Ambassador to Australia Genta Holmes expressing their respective governments’ agreement to extend the terms of the 1966 “Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United States of America relating to the Establishment of a Joint Defence Facility at Pine Gap. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Hence Oliver Wendell Holmes’s famous statement that “it is the merit of the common law that it decides the case first and determines the principle afterwards. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Ian Ayres
Ian Ayres and Greg KlassTouro law professor, Dan Subotnik, has publishedan extended email exchange that helps to teach an important legal and moral differences between “never intending” and “intending never. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Quinta Jurecic
Perovich, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes cautioned, “A pardon in our days is not a private act of grace from an individual happening to possess power. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am by ernst
  After quoting Holmes’s opinion in Miller, Peckham concluded it did not, but only because “the ex parte finding of the health officers as to the fact [of the poultry’s unwholesomeness] is not in any way binding” in a subsequent judicial proceeding. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am by JB
Oliver Wendell Holmes once remarked that the epigraph on his tombstone should read, "Here lies the supple tool of power. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:27 pm by MOTP
The benefits of the proposals would include: A day in court for consumers: The proposals under consideration would give consumers their day in court to hold companies accountable for wrongdoing.Often the harm to an individual consumer may be too small to make it practical to pursue litigation, even where the overall harm to consumers is significant. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:44 pm by Ken White
I previously explained at length how Holmes said it in the context of the Supreme Court's strong wartime pro-censorship push and subsequently retreated from it. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
Dabney's Vornado case:The divergence between the Federal Circuit's and this Court's precedents is so extreme that one recent commentator made what can only be described as an unusual observation following this Court's 2002 ruling in Holmes Group, Inc. [read post]