Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS" Results 5061 - 5080 of 7,564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 1:45 pm by Courtney Minick
Many final appellate decisions and many state codes are only published in their official form by a private publisher. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
No citizen may be arrested except with the approval or by decision of a people's procuratorate or by decision of a people's court, and arrests must be made by a public security organ. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Once the deception is there, you’re gambling that consumers will understand it. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:20 pm by Andy Frame
That’s a decision the defense lawyers will have to make. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 10:20 pm by Bill Marler
 Here is a “sample platter” by “bug:” Botulism Castleberry – In July of 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and public health officials in Texas and Indiana joined to investigate a botulism outbreak. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The communications under consideration were received on 8 May 2012, i.e. the first working day after a public holiday in the UK. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Wydra, in which they argue that “the preclearance requirement contained in Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act seeks to enforce the core purpose of the Fifteenth Amendment, and the nearly unanimous, bipartisan decision of Congress to re-authorize it falls squarely within Congress’s broad power to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 They’re all agencies that are making decisions which affect billion dollar companies and industries, as well as the lives of millions of Americans, every day. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am by Anubha Sinha
He discussed the interesting aspects of the US decision. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:00 am
So it’s no wonder that consumer advocates say that the decision in the Company Doe case threatens the integrity of the consumer product database. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm by Howard Knopf
What about res judicata, stare decisis, and practical issues such as refunding money to those who ultimately paid in the end – namely consumers? [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:00 pm
According to the public interest news site ProPublica.org, things are moving slowly, but they’re moving. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
., footnote 19 of the FISA Court of Review’s 2002 decision in In re Sealed Case). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 10:03 am by Larry Catá Backer
Many are continuing to struggle to conceptualize the challenges globalization creates and “this ‘reality’ reflects deep running transformations of the normative and institutional regulatory landscape…. of intertwining, both public and private, that is hybrid, forms of regulation that can no longer be easily associated with one particular country or, for that matter, one officially mandated rule-making authority. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
TDCJ officials (perhaps rightly) view those sort of policy decisions as the province of the Legislature and the courts and historically have been loathe ever to suggest statutory changes the Legislature could enact to lessen prison admissions. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Without disclosing whether Third Coast charges different prices for various pot strains, or fees to facilitate transactions, their spokesperson said, “ultimately, we’re a private club, not a public store…” Well, good luck with that…While the decision no doubt spells hardship for those in the, er, budding industry, Jim Lynch of the Detroit News observes “Panicked Uncertainty”. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 5:41 am by Jack Goldsmith
 The decision to put Brennan as director of the CIA is a decision to stamp presidential authority over the agency, and to bring it firmly under control. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
On appeal, the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM upheld the decision concerning the applicability of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), but remitted the case to the Examination Division for re-examination of the applicability of Article 7(3). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
 Pity, then, that this is what we’re left to evaluate. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
But what has been debated and parsed in the aftermath of the six crashes and explosions that left 11 dead and 24 injured is whether the agency's decision to re-open the highway was the sole fatal mistake. [read post]