Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 21,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2020, 1:50 pm
If the negligence of the highway driver was the proximate cause of an accident, they may be held liable, despite the other driver’s failure to yield the right-of-way. [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 10:20 am
Timothy Abeel & Associates, P.C. has decades of experience defending the rights of car buyers in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the case, both on the grounds that F.S. 768.21(8) prohibits adult children from pursuing damages in medical malpractice wrongful death lawsuits and the case was time-barred under the statute of limitations (the latter being “not well-taken” by the appellate court upon review). [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the case, both on the grounds that F.S. 768.21(8) prohibits adult children from pursuing damages in medical malpractice wrongful death lawsuits and the case was time-barred under the statute of limitations (the latter being “not well-taken” by the appellate court upon review). [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
The wrinkle in this class action suit is that it seeks to hold GPB Capital, GPB’s various funds, and several GPB insiders liable for the alleged gross mismanagement of the fund and the misrepresentations made to, and subsequently used by, broker-dealers. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
Proposition 4 Persons are not liable under the law of defamation for statements that they do not publish or authorize another to publish. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Zeringue alleged all were liable for asbestos-causing injuries based on claims of strict liability, negligence, and failure to warn; but specifically stated that Crane and twelve out of the twenty-one defendants were responsible for handling and sending the asbestos-containing products to the places he was exposed. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:07 am
After the motion was granted, the defendants moved for summary judgment based on the plaintiff’s lack of any causation expert, which was also granted. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Article I of the Constitution provides that “[j]udgment in cases of impeachment shall extend no further than to removal from Office [and disqualification from future office] but the Party . . . shall . . . be liable and subject to . . . punishment according to law. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 3:37 pm
Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by Domino’s Pizza LLC, sending Domino’s back to the trial court to determine if it can be held liable under the ADA for website accessibility. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
“It could be something as minor as the mere fact that two claims were filed against the same corporate defendant. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 10:35 am
§ 164.316; and Despite OCR’s investigation and technical assistance, “did not take meaningful steps to address their systemic failures. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:00 am
Both the person encouraging the referral and the person making the referral can be held liable. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm
In Pennsylvania, and elsewhere, wrongful death plaintiffs have a right to sue and recover against the liable defendant (whose negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct caused the death at-issue) for damages that they suffer as direct result of their loved one’s death. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 7:33 am
You still have the burden of proving that the unknown motorist was the cause of your accident, that you were not liable, and that your injuries were caused by the accident. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
The Florida-based defendant was ordered to pay the defendant company $150,000 - the maximum that could be awarded as copyright infringement damages. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 3:59 am
The dispute could grow in complexity due to the presence of multiple liable defendants. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:10 am
The plaintiff’s acceptance of the risk of harm operates to relieve the defendant of their responsibility to the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
This case is considering whether the defendant employer should be liable for sexual assaults committed by a medical practitioner in the course of medical examinations carried out at the employer’s request either before or during the claimant’s employment. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
In other words, to hold the employer liable, the employee’s wrongful actions must have taken place while he was performing a service or task he was being paid to perform. [read post]
