Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 5,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 9:03 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
Much of this furor stems from the outrageous decision issued by the Supreme Court in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:02 am
State of Bihar, [AIR 1989 SC 1456], Muniappan v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 11:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 11:38 am
In Esparza v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 7:28 pm
" United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:01 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:00 am
The second case is Stack v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
Earlier this week, in the FCC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Later, in a second petition for post-conviction relief, Cone raised the claim that the State had violated Brady v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 6:48 am
It is a habeas case reviewing the waiver and procedural barring of a Brady violation claim based on the complex procedural history of the state direct and collateral reviews. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
Oral Argument Preview In Atkins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
The entire register will now also be online, which I noted brings in professional reputation management issues into light. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
Personally I don't have a big problem with electing judges because the appointed ones can be just as biased and political.Protecting journalists before they're extinctBy contrast, it looks like the Lege may finally pass a journalists' shield law, possibly just before the last ones leave the building and turn out the lights at the state's daily newspapers.Collective bargaining for private jails? [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
An order to move would be reasonable for people milling about on the side of the road, but not to Hardy and Myers who were told to stay on the bar ditch and did so.Presiding Judge Keller dissented, along with Meyers, Keasler, and Hervey because the majority failed to view the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court's verdict. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:51 am
Williams' decisions ran afoul of § 27-14-407 was supported by substantial evidence viewed in light of the record as a whole. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
Flores, No. 08-294 (consolidated with Arizona State Speaker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
Beaty and Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
